Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amelia Rajecki vs Asia Muhammad Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rajecki vs Muhammad analysis and find out who is favored!
Amelia Rajecki vs Asia Muhammad Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rajecki 1 - 0 Muhammad
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rajecki has won 39.53% of points on their second serve, while Muhammad has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rajecki, in recent form, has won 51.19% of their opponent's second serve points, while Muhammad has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.62% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rajecki has saved 51.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Muhammad has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rajecki has won 47.37% of matches played (W/L 9/ 10), with Muhammad winning 72.73% (W/L 8/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rajecki has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 13/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Muhammad has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 226/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 13/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Rajecki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 9/ 8), where as Muhammad has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 85.71% of matches (W/L 6/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rajecki winning 1 times and Muhammad being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Rajecki winning 2 and Muhammad winning 1. The last match between Rajecki and Muhammad was at the Rothesay Open - Nottingham, 10-06-2023, Q1 round, Grass with Amelia Rajecki getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rajecki and Muhammad have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rajecki winning 1 times and Muhammad 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rajecki winning 0, and Muhammad 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rajecki has played against opponents with an average rank of 300.84 while Muhammad has played against players with an average rank of 106.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rajecki has won 14% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Muhammad has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rajecki has converted 61.9% of breakpoint opportunities, and Muhammad has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
794
Rank
703
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
548
Rank
124
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
48% (20-22)
Career Total W/L
54% (316-270)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,075
Career Prize Money
$286,274
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Amelia Rajecki vs Asia Muhammad For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Rajecki VS Muhammad
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Amelia Rajecki | Asia Muhammad |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:10 | 1:59:10 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (68/106) | 58% (51/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (42/68) | 69% (35/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (24/38) | 46% (17/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (36/88) | 38% (40/106) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Asia Muhammad
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
7
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amelia Rajecki | Asia Muhammad |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (36/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 9 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:17 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 257.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (132/218) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (90/132) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (34/86) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 62% (13/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (99/229) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Amelia Rajecki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Amelia Rajecki
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Amelia Rajecki
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Urszula Radwanska
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Amelia Rajecki
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
80)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Amelia Rajecki
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Unknown Player
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Gabriella Price
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Ania Hertel
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Asia Muhammad Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Asia Muhammad
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
87 of
120)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
21%
(
5 of
24)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
120)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Victoria Rodriguez
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Asia Muhammad
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Asia Muhammad
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Sohyun Park
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve %
61%
(
19 of
31)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Amarni Banks
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Anna Brogan
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Asia Muhammad
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Rajecki Vs Muhammad Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Rajecki are available here and Muhammad photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
